NEW:How AIPAC, crypto & AI super PACs are buying elections — Follow the Money→

Follow the Money: How Super PACs Override Your Vote

Federal law caps individual donations at $3,500 per election. But a system of super PACs, dark money groups, and bundlers lets wealthy interests spend hundreds of millions to decide who represents you — and they don’t need your permission.

PACs, super PACs, dark money, and bundling — what each one does

SPAC

Super PAC

UNLIMITED raising & spending

Born from Citizens United (2010). Can raise unlimited money from individuals, corporations, and unions. BUT cannot give directly to candidates or coordinate with campaigns. Spends on independent ads, mailers, etc. KEY DIFFERENCE FROM CORPORATE PACs: A corporate PAC is tied to one company and gives directly to candidates (capped). A super PAC is independent, takes money from ANY source (unlimited), and spends on its own. Candidates can technically claim they don’t ‘receive’ super PAC money — because it’s spent independently, not donated to them. Fairshake (crypto), Leading the Future (AI), and United Democracy Project (AIPAC) are all super PACs.

The key distinction

PACs give money to candidates (capped at $5K/election). Super PACs spend money on behalf of candidates independently (unlimited) — TV ads, mailers, digital campaigns, opposition research — without the candidate’s official involvement. They cannot coordinate with the campaign, in theory. This distinction, created by Citizens United (2010), is why voters have less say in who represents them than billionaires and industry lobbies do.

About AIPAC

AIPAC operates both a traditional PAC and a super PAC (United Democracy Project). The PAC bundles individual donations to candidates. The super PAC runs independent ads. Combined, they spent ~$127M in the 2024 cycle — making them one of the largest outside spenders in congressional races.

WARNING: The “No Corporate PAC Money” Pledge

Many politicians pledge to reject “corporate PAC money.” This sounds sweeping — but it’s a very narrow category. Here’s what it does and doesn’t cover:

BLOCKED:Corporate PACs (e.g., ExxonMobil PAC, Pfizer PAC) — the SSFs tied to a specific company. These give $5K/election directly to campaigns.
STILL ACCEPTED:Super PAC spending — candidates don’t technically “receive” this money, it’s spent independently on their behalf. Millions from Fairshake, Leading the Future, or AIPAC’s UDP can still flood their race.
STILL ACCEPTED:AIPAC PAC donations — AIPAC’s PAC is a “non-connected” PAC, not a corporate PAC. It bundles individual donations, not corporate treasury funds. So its money doesn’t fall under most “no corporate PAC” pledges.
STILL ACCEPTED:Individual donations from corporate executives — a CEO can still give $3,500 directly out of personal funds. Bundlers can collect hundreds of these.
STILL ACCEPTED:Dark money (501c4) — undisclosed donors can fund groups that influence elections behind the scenes.

Bottom line: A candidate can reject “corporate PAC money,” benefit from tens of millions in AIPAC, crypto, or AI super PAC spending, accept AIPAC PAC bundled donations, and technically be telling the truth. The pledge blocks one small pipe while leaving the firehoses wide open.

Every figure in this guide was verified against primary sources (FEC filings, OpenSecrets data) or major investigative reporting. Where sources disagree on exact totals, we use the most commonly cited figure. 2026 cycle figures are as of January 2026 and are still changing. Last verified March 27, 2026.

How Money Works in Politics — Campaign Finance Explainer | Marena Lin for Congress